Category: Ecology

We’ve got no fucking idea! My choice of words might upset you, somehow I don’t care. I am aware of the harshness of the language, maybe even the inappropriateness of it. And yes you are welcome to take me to task about it, but only if and when you seriously engage with the following. The invisible children of Southern Sudan and Northern Uganda. The stolen generation of Australia. Children in the global sweatshop. The starving in famine-struck Somalia. The people of Kiribati. The people who work and live in the Mine, Guatemala City. The oil sand exploitation of Athabasca and similar areas. The oil fields of the Niger delta. Any of the active genocides that are taking place in the world. And don’t just read about the above on the internet, run the search on Google Images with safe search off, the latter is a cop-out; even better, visit one or two of the places if you can.

But you don’t need to travel that far and “exotic” to see, hear and experience how really clueless and irrelevant we have become. Take a drive through the far flung reaches of the North-West and Eastern Cape provinces of South Africa. Visit city centres and prominent harbours. Talk to the youth in South Africa and then to a few drug addicts, prostitutes, homeless, jobless and oppressed. Spend a day at an animal shelter or at any underground dog-fighting ring. Walk a day next to a workhorse in Khayelitsha. Open your eyes and ears to your own comfort and privilege. Open your eyes and ears to the very real suffering in the world. Open your eyes and ears to the call of Jesus. Really step out of your comfort zone for a moment and experience.

And whilst at it, remember the words of Jesus, and ponder it for a little while.

“Then he spoke: You’re blessed when you’ve lost it all. God’s kingdom is there for the finding.  You’re blessed when you’re ravenously hungry. Then you’re ready for the Messianic meal. You’re blessed when the tears flow freely. Joy comes with the morning. “Count yourself blessed every time someone cuts you down or throws you out, every time someone smears or blackens your name to discredit me. What it means is that the truth is too close for comfort and that that person is uncomfortable. You can be glad when that happens – skip like a lamb, if you like! – for even though they don’t like it, I do . . . and all heaven applauds. And know that you are in good company; my preachers and witnesses have always been treated like this. Give Away Your Life But it’s trouble ahead if you think you have it made. What you have is all you’ll ever get. And it’s trouble ahead if you’re satisfied with yourself. Your self will not satisfy you for long. And it’s trouble ahead if you think life’s all fun and games. There’s suffering to be met, and you’re going to meet it. “There’s trouble ahead when you live only for the approval of others, saying what flatters them, doing what indulges them. Popularity contests are not truth contests – look how many scoundrel preachers were approved by your ancestors! Your task is to be true, not popular.” (Luke 6:20-26)

And once you have done that, then, but only then, you are welcome to challenge me on my choice of words at the beginning of this reflection.


We live in an age, somewhere post modernism, after the demise of meta-narratives, somehow knowing where we are not and desperately trying to figure out where exactly we are. This short sketch is an attempt to struggle with the “exactly where we are”. I propose three common denominators for the age we live in, Digital, Networked, and Anthropocene.

Without a doubt two of the most significant developments during the late 20th century was the personal computer, which Taleb signifies as a Black Swan Event, and the web, another of those Black Swans. The Web made it’s debut during 1989 and it spread to offices and homes by 1994. Digital cameras arrived on the scene in 1990, cellphones during 1977, cellphones with cameras during 1999, chatrooms opened it’s doors during 1980, Facebook launched 2004, Twitter 2006 and an ever increasing list of portals where digital data is created and stored. The mere act of using the internet during 2011 will create more digital data about an user than the user him-/herself can generate. The dawn of the digital age broke over the earth during 2002 when more digital data was generated than analogue data. 2011 will see another 1.8 zettabytes of data created, 33% more than 2010, or in other words, the equivalent of 57.5 billion 32GB Apple iPads filled with data. Enough to build a technological wall of China, as long and as wide, but twice as high. We truly live in a digital world.

One of the mainstays of the digital era is the hubs, nodes, linking datacables, and wifi signals that create a vast Network of 1’s and 0’s. The network(s) that underlie the digital world is not merely a bunch of microchips and optic fibre, but creates an environment which allows not only digital communication and data creation, but for interactions in the “real” world with very “real” implications. We use networks to order our lives, from buying food to organizing social get togethers, from insiting revolution on the one side of the planet to exploiting the planet on the other side, from building community with family and friends vast distances away to destroying communities close by. Today more than ever before do we realize that we are part of a vast network, both digitally and naturally, where technology matters but networks far exceed the virtual world. It seems there might be truth in the saying that when a butterfly flaps it’s wings in America, it creates a tropical storm in the Orient, a truly networked society.

Last, but not least, is the realization that we live in a day an age, a biosphere where the activities of man(!)kind is shaping the very space we live in. It’s been suggested that a case can be made that we are living in the Anthropocene, a new geological age or even a new geological epoch alltogether. If the suggested Anthropocene is an age it falls under the epoch Holocene. If not and it is recognize as an epoch in its own right, it follows on the Holocene that started approximately 10 000 years ago after the end of the Pleistocene and falls under the period Quaternary, which started an estimated 2.6 million years ago. The term was coined by ecologist Eugene Stoermer and widely popularized by the atmospheric chemist, Paul Crutzen. The Stratigraphy Commission of the Geological Society of London deemed the proposal, to formally accept the Anthropocene as part of the Geological Time Scale, as having merit and thus the proposed addition of the Anthropocene is currently being studied. Accepted or not, we are living in an age where (wo)mankind has an ever increasing impact on the world around us.

The age we are experiencing at the moment often leaves us gasping for air, scrambling for descriptive words. There might be many such word and concepts out there, however, I want to welcome you to… the Digital Networked Anthropocen (DNA).

2011 marks fifty years of successful conservation for WWF, one of the world’s leading environmental and conservation organisations.

As WWF staff and supporters gathered in Zurich last week to celebrate their half-century, guest of honour Archbishop Desmond Tutu – a long-time champion of fair and sustainable development – warned that we live in a world threatened by greed and consumerism.

“Our desire to consume everything of value, to extract every precious stone, every drop of oil and every creature from the sea knows no bounds,” said the Archbishop. “This quest for profit subverts our present and our future. There are too many people who are getting better and better at exploiting the environmental heritage which belongs to us all. We are not heading for an environmental disaster – we have already created one.”

“We are meant to live in a world which we share, and we are meant to live as members of one family,” said Archbishop Tutu. “And yet whenever we look around, isn’t it devastating to see the inequities and levels of poverty? Our population is increasing, environmental degradation is increasing. How do we resolve these inequities when all we are told is growth, growth, growth?”

However the Archbishop sounded an optimistic note and said he believed humankind could learn to live within its limits. “There is enough for everyone – but not enough for our greed,” he said. “There’s enough for us all to live a full life – so why do we want to destroy the only home we have?”

Since 1961, WWF has been instrumental in getting more than a billion hectares protected, several species brought back from the brink of extinction, and raising more than one billion dollars in conservation finance. The organisation is now supported by more than five million people and is active in over 100 countries on five continents.

Swiss President Micheline Calmy-Rey highlighted WWF’s record of achievements and said the organisation was vital in today’s world. “The protection and sustainable use of natural resources is one of the most pressing issues today. Thanks to WWF we have learned we have to take a holistic approach to the environment,” she said. “Addressing environmental issues at global as well as local levels becomes ever more important.”

Earlier, guests at the gala event in Zurich heard WWF International President Yolanda Kakabdse outline the advances made in conservation in the past half-century. “When WWF was founded there were no ministers of the environment and no environmental treaties. Today such ministries are found in governments worldwide, and treaties are increasingly used to govern and protect the environment,” she said.

“Right from the beginning, this organisation has been built by individuals with a deep and inspiring passion: a commitment to stop environmental degradation and build a future where people live in harmony with nature, ” said Ms Kakabadse. She also joked that the Duke of Edinburgh – President Emeritus of WWF – would have been present were it not for a family wedding taking place in London. In a message Prince Philip said: “Perhaps its [WWF’s] greatest achievement so far has been to make a significant number of people in all communities, in all parts of the world, aware of the serious threats facing the world’s natural environment.”

Al-Jazeera anchor Veronica Pedrosa introduced a video-taped message from world-famous naturalist and broadcaster Sir David Attenborough in which he said conservation organisations such as WWF were becoming increasingly important as the planet faces greater challenges. “As WWF has pointed out, this is an issue for everybody because it affects everybody,” said Sir David. “We are dependent on the natural world for everything we need. The job of WWF is more important than ever and it deserves all the support it can get.”

WWF International Director General Jim Leape reminded guests why they were there and of the work still to be done to achieve a fair and sustainable world for all. “The world would be much poorer today without our efforts, yet it is a cruel irony that, for all that we have accomplished together, somehow we have to find a way to do even more. We have to find a way to bend the curves that will define our future – carbon, water, fisheries, erosion of biodiversity; fraying of the fabric of life. We have to find a new way to forge connections with nature.”

“We live in an increasingly urbanised society that is largely ignorant of the wonders that inspire us. And we live in an economy that is still often stubbornly indifferent to the natural systems upon which it depends,” said Mr Leape.

Guests at the gala evening – which was held to say “thank-you” to staff and supporters world-wide – were treated to environmentally-themed theatre, dance, and musical performances, specially-commissioned art installations and a children’s choir. WWF stressed that the costs of the event had been met by sponsors Chopard and Sarasin.

This article was originally posted on the WWF website.

This is the space in which things are happening. To quote Carl Sagan (1994:6-7):

“Look again at that dot. That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every “superstar,” every “supreme leader,” every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there–on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.”

In this space we find all known created life together with a vast array of different ways of thinking, talking, doing and relating. Allow me a few thoughts on the way missions are understood in this broader context. I will give a brief background on the concept of inculturation followed by a bit of critique of the concept. In conclusion I would like to introduce a new concept which, at least so I hope, would enrich the conversation regarding missions.

Inculturation (Bosch 2009:447) is a modern word for an ancient practice, one that reaches as far back as the early church. Lamin Sanneh states that “in straddling the Jewish-Gentile worlds, [the early church] was born in a cross-cultural milieu with translation as its birthmark” (Stackhouse 1988:58 cf Bosch 2009:448). The history of the church, however, is marked by a move away from this translation into cultures. In contrast it became the perpetrator of a culture, what we know as the Corpus Christianum.

It is in this context, of the church having forgotten her translation roots and having become an institution that is marked with culture-snobbism, that Pierre Charles borrows from cultural anthropology the term “enculturation” and introduces it to missiology. The term gained popularity and in 1962 Masson coined the phrase inculturated Cathoclism (Catholicisme inculturé), resulting in the term “inculturation” which soon became popular amongst the Jesuits. The term continued to gain popularity and is today one of the most widely used concepts in missiology across ecumenical boundaries (Bosch 2009:447-448).

The question arises, however, whether the concept inculturaion is still sufficient for the special need(s) of our day and age, centring especially on the continuous evolving and increasingly urgent crisis of climate change (cf McFague 2008). For the purposes of our discussion it is the historical roots of the crisis and its implications, rather than its complexities, which are at issue (White 1967). Dramatic technological advancement during the Middle Ages resulted in a change of the relationship of (wo)mankind to soil and hence nature as a whole. With the dawn of technology; we moved from being part of to being exploiters of nature (White 1967:1205). Lately it seems that there is a gear change in (wo)mankind’s exploitation of nature. Tom McMillan remarks that “for 200 years we’ve been conquering Nature. Now we’re beating it to death” (Lyman 1990) In the resulting dualism, (wo)man became the (perceived) master, and we lost our tsaheylu, to borrow a phrase from the movie Avatar. Tsaheylu can be described as the essential connection with one’s surroundings. Technological advancement upon technological advancement, the discovery of ancient sunlight (cf Hartman 2004), oil, and the Industrial Revolution all added up to our current, and future, predicament.

In light of this ever-widening dualistic chasm between humankind and nature, we propose that the concept inculturation be revisited. The term “culture” stems from the Latin cultura with its roots in colere which means “to cultivate”. The concept “culture” evolved from being used in terms of agriculture to a description of human phenomena, pertaining to both individualism and nationalism, amongst others. The concept “inculturation” therefore is inherently focussed on human creative efforts on the one hand, and the translation of the Good News into different cultures on the other. As such inculturation engages the “other,” understood as other human being(s).

Opposed to such an anthropocentric view of the “other”; I would like to argue for a more inclusive approach. As such the very term “other” needs to be redefined in terms of Creation as a whole. This becomes possible if missions is understood more in line of Schmitz’s (1971) description of missions as “God’s turning to the world” and not the salvation of the individual heathen’s soul per se. Such a redefinition of the “other” leads one to the inevitable conclusion that the concept inculturation with its anthropocentric core needs reconceptualising as well.

It is with this challenge of reconceptualising in front of me that I would like to introduce a new concept. I briefly touched on our loss of partnership with the soil we live on, the resulting hierarchical dualism and the ensuing loss of tsaheylu (Avatar 2011) with creation. I think that Avatar (2011) offers a powerful metaphor in this context of estrangement.

Please allow me a short break from my argument to make a small disclaimer. The use of Avatar is not without peril. It condones violence as a viable, maybe the only, solution, it romanticizes the indigenous people as noble savages and paints the White Man, once again, as the saviour. However, I do not think the metaphor is without redemption and I am of the opinion that it visualizes something of our disconnection with Creation and the need to rediscover it.

Jake Sully, a human from earth imbued with a functional view of natural resources, arrives on Pandora to take part in an avatar program. His mandate is to participate in scientific missions whist learning as much as possible from the local Na’vi in order to assist his employers (a company very willing to make use of military stratagems), to effectively extract unobtanium, a scarce and highly-prized (expensive) mineral from under the clan’s home tree (Avatar 2009).

Let the inculturation begin. Jake is taken into the Na’vi clan, the Omaticaya, and is tutored by the Neytiri, the tribal leader’s daughter (it is a movie!). He eventually presents the Omaticaya with the company’s ultimatum, albeit for different reasons than those he set out with initially. The magic, however, occurs during the time that he is taught by Neytiri. Jake is initially described as a full cup, a person who sees even less than a rock. Jake’s introduction to sight (kame) is when he forms a tsaheylu with a horse and Neytiri tells him to feel the mare, to feel how her heart beats and to feel how she breathes. From his state of ignorance Jake is taught to see the world, to become ingrained in the network of energy that flows through all living things. Jake Sully, the blind outsider, is not only accepted as part of the Omaticaya clan but his tsaheylu with the natural world is fully restored (Avatar 2011).

It is this concept of becoming part of creation again, that I would like to highlight. For the lack of a term to describe it and in the tradition of incarnation and inculturation I would like to suggest the term increation. This term is difficult to grasp for modern Christian minds who understand the salvation of the individual soul as the redemptive pinnacle of, what Brian McLaren (2010:50) calls the Greco-Roman narrative, and who habitually view the created world as a functional thing to be used in pursuit of individual wealth. Our modern difficulty with the concept of increation is further complicated by the loss of primal cultures that might have exhibited something of these values, for example the San of South Africa and the Inuit of the Arctic circle. Once again, without nobilizing them nor refuting the impact that they had on their environment.

I propose that the challenge facing missions is not so much inculturation as increation: to re-establish the connection between (wo)mankind and Creation, to bridge the dualism between nature and history and to transcend the Greco-Roman salvation narrative. The increation of the Gospel message will without a doubt help (wo)mankind address social injustices and ecological destruction, and will contribute to the recognition of God’s sovereignty over all of Creation. The incarnation of Christ was a moment of increation: he became flesh, a creature first and foremost. It happened to be in the form of (wo)mankind.

Concluding. In our context of an ever growing disconnect with the “other”, both other-humanity and other-creation, we are in desperate need of inculturation and, in my opinion, even more so of increation; not to the exclusion of the other but rather as complimenting ways of approaching missions. Both requires an intentional critique of the status quo, of our perception of superiority as humans, as consumers, as westerners and where applicable as whites. I thank you.

Bosch, David J 2009. Transforming mission: paradigm shifts in theology of mission.

Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

Hartman, Thom 2004. The last hours of ancient sunlight.New York : Three River


Lyman, Francesca 1990. The greenhouse trap: what we’re doing to the atmosphere

and how we can slow global warming. Michigan: Beacon Press

McFague, Sally 2008. A new climate for theology. Minneapolis: Fortress Press

McLaren, Brian 2010. A new kind of Christianity. London: Hodder&Stoughton

Sagan, Carl 1994. Pale blue dot: a vision of the human future in space. Michigan:

Random House

Schmitz, Josef 1971. Die Weltzuwendung Gottes: Thesen zu einer Theologie der

Mission. Freiburg/B: Imba-Verlag

Stackhouse, Max 1988. Apologia: Contextualization, globalization, and mission in

Theological education. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans

White, L 1967. The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science 155, 1203-


Avatar 2009. Film. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation

Originally posted on retrieved on 22 March 2011 at 11:26

Reduce, Re-use, Recle.

Eet minder! Ry minder! Koop minder! Upgrade minder! Vergeet om as maatstaf die Geldenhuise (Jones’s) te gebruik. Bou kleiner! Sit ligte af! Sit die radio af as niemand luister nie! Dra klere langer! Begin ‘n wurmplaas en groentetuin. Gooi die swembad toe!

Verraai jou ego, spyker dit teen die kruis. Ons ego’s verg energie en energie veroorsaak ekstra CO2 wat die toekoms van ons kinders en verseker hulle kinders bedreig. Raak deel van die gesprek!

Hou op om dwars te trek om jou eie gemaksone te beskerm, die planeet is in die gemors en ons is die oorsaak. Rook minder! Eet minder vleis (moeilik vir ons Suid-Afrikaners!). Moenie met die 4×4 die kinders by die skool gaan haal of inkopies gaan doen nie, ons paaie is nie so sleg nie!

Maar nou ja, die goed kom te naby aan ons lyf; so wie stel belang? Ons gefokus op ons self, te hel met ons kinders. Wanneer hulle swaarkry is ons al dood! (‘n Argument wat meer as een persoon al actually teenoor my gebruik het).

Ons bely Christus, self-opofferende liefde is ‘n waarde van Hom, maar vir is dit een te veel gevra. Dit is mos maklik, se ek glo en dan kan ek maak wat ek wil, leef soos ek wil, want ek glo en is deur genade alleen gered. Ek wonder of Paulus of Jakobus sou saamstem? A person is not defined by the cover but by his actions (Megamind). Is it possible that our faith is also defined by our actions? (James of te wel Jakobus)

En ons keuse is? Onthou dit word bely deur ons dade!